Baltic IT&T
Articles

ICT Events

E-government

E-society

ICT Market

Communications

Archive

News

Baltic IT&T 2010

ICT Calendar

Contacts   








Hosted by:
SigmaNet



 
   
Home > Contacts

Contacts266  

Baltic Information Technology & Telecommunications Review

Issued by:
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications
(www.mkm.ee), Republic of Estonia
Represented by 
Margus Püüa, Head of Department of State Information Systems, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, Republic of Estonia

Ministry of Electronic Government Affairs (www.eps.gov.lv), Republic of Latvia
Represented by 
Signe Bāliņa, Minister of Electronic Government Affairs, Republic of Latvia

Information Society Development Committee (www.ivpk.lt), Government, Republic of Lithuania
Represented by
Aurimas Matulis,
Director of the Information Society Development Committee, Government, Republic of Lithuania

Editors:

Editor in chief:
Māra Jākobsone,
Data Media Group, Latvia
Stabu 47, Rīga, LV 1011, LATVIA
Phone: +371 67311821, 29277304
Fax: +371 67315567
E-mail: mara.j(at)dtmedia.lv

Executive Editor:
Andris Melnūdris,

Data Media Group, Latvia
Stabu 47, Rīga, LV 1011, LATVIA
Phone: +371 67311821, 29277304
Fax: +371 67315567
E-mail: andris.m(at)dtmedia.lv

Juhan Pruuden,
InfoSys OÜ, Estonia
Ahtri 12, EE-10151 Tallinn, ESTONIA
Phone: +372 6261135
Fax: +372 6261021
E-mail: juhan(at)infosys.ee

Saule Jokūbauskienė,
Information Society Development Committee, Government, Republic of Lithuania
Vilniaus g. 18, Vilnius LT-01119, LITHUANIA
Phone: +370 5 2665183
Fax: +370 5 2665180
E-mail: s.jokubauskiene(at)ivpk.lt  






eBaltics
07.09.2010


Top news
Instantly online - 17 golden rules to combat online risks and for safer surfing mobile social networks
Experts Warn of ICT Labour Shortage and Loss of Competitive Edge in Europe by 2015
Lithuanian organisations has been active to participate in CIP ICT PSP third call

Question for readers
How secure you evaluate your information and data?
Highly secure
  4%
Quite secure, but some security improvements are needed
  24%
Security is insufficient
  8%
No security at all
  64%